T Cobe
Posted
8 years 7 months ago
Sorry, one more follow up that has occurred to me based on recent discussions on two channel systems and the 8802A from Marantz. In my mind, the biggest reason someone may choose the 8802 is for the two channel capabilities. I think this is in folly as a good two channel pre-amp with home theater bypass could last multiple generations longer than a surround processor.
Spending an extra $1000 now on the Marantz for stereo reproduction capabilities will have to be spent again on the next upgrade. Additionally, a dedicated pre-amp or even a quality integrated amp would likely sound better and last longer. All in one solutions tend to make more compromises, IMO. These are all just my opinions but I think they are sound. I'm sure there are those that would prefer the simplicity of the 8802A as a single solution, along with the space savings. Again, there's certainly no wrong way.
Cheers,
T Cobe
Speakers: Triton One L/R, SCXL, Aon 3 Surr/Back, HTR-7000 Height
Pre/Pro/AVR: Anthem AVM 60, Emotiva XSP-1
Amps: Emotiva XPA-5(2), Emotiva XPA-1L (2)
Sources: Oppo BDP-103D, Emotiva ERC-3, PS4, Pioneer PLX-1000 w/Ortofon 2M Bronze
Display: Epson 6030 UB, Elite Screens 110" Sable
The following user(s) said Thank You:
anthem
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.