GoldenEar | A Passion for Sonic Perfection

file Rca vs Xlr - Bel Canto 600m

  • HTSME's Avatar Offline
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
    • Posts: 160
    • Thank you received: 287
  • arrow_drop_downMore arrow_drop_upLess
HTSME Posted 6 years 6 months ago
#23660

charliehatch wrote: Wayne, admit it. You just LOVE that harmonic distortion, toob man! :woohoo:

I should clarify what I said above. Balanced is for those cases where you have a low signal-to-noise ratio. Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I think it was developed to deal with really low-level microphone signals in longer cables where noise was a real problem.

I guess we need another A/B blind test here. I'll add it to the list.
Charlie

Charlie, agree, go ahead and conduct a blind test and let us know what you hear.

Del
The following user(s) said Thank You: WayneWilmeth

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Steveo's Avatar Offline school
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
    • Posts: 180
    • Thank you received: 297
  • arrow_drop_downMore arrow_drop_upLess
Steveo Posted 6 years 6 months ago
#23661
Charlie might as well give it a AB test. They made a big improvement with my 600ms and have heard they were designed for xlr use
Triton Ref Pair, Supercenter Ref, SS 3's surr
Digital-Nimitra Server>USPCB>Iso Regen>TX Ultra>chord mscaler>chord dave>deqx hdp5
Analog-Technics sp10mk2, Ortofon Quintet Black , Michell Tecnoarm
Bel Canto REF600m L & R, Emotiva Xpa 5 Gen 3 for Center and rears
Subs 2xJTR 2400captivator
PS Audio P10
The following user(s) said Thank You: WayneWilmeth, HTSME

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Moderator
menu
close
Menu
Account
Keyword
person_outline
arrow_back
You are here: Home Forum Advanced Topics DIY, Mods and Tweaks Rca vs Xlr - Bel Canto 600m