rjohn79395
Posted
6 years 2 weeks ago
There' probably no single answer that would match everyone's vision of best combination of pure speaker bang for the buck and aesthetcs that may add cost but not sound quality. And yes, anesthetics is in the eye of the beholder.
Having looked at and listened to, Ref's and T1's and 2's in my system over time, I'd like to weigh in:
The Ref's' finish, part gloss, has never distracted me, Frankly, I like it. Just the right combination of being subtle but classy at the same time IMHO. I have never been distracted by it's appearance. No glare. Just sits there looking quietly classy.
Re speaker performance vs. aesthetic looks issues, I can see not wanting to pay for fancy wood or burnished metal finishes that add a lot of cost with no sound quality benefit. I think the Ref's add just a touch of aeathetic uptic while retaining the value first approach and.Goldenear look
Just my opinion, but if there were a sock only option for the Ref's, I'd still opt for exactly what I have, amazing speakers that quietly but gracefully understate their presence and then just blow you away with their performance.
Whatever works, but that sure works for me.
Rick
5.4.4 HT speakers: T Ref fronts/LFE 1, SuperCenter Ref, T1 surrounds/LFE 2 + SuperSub XXL, HTR 7000 top fronts, HTR 8000 top rears
Zone 2 speakers; 2 Invisa 525's
AVR: Marantz SR 8015
Amp: AT525NC 5 channel
Cable/TiVo, OPPO BDP 105D, Bluesound Node 2i, Apple tv 4K streamer
48" SONY 4K OLED TV
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.